Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie <guthrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(guthrie@counterex | |ample.org) | --- Comment #7 from John Guthrie <guthrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-22 22:47:10 EDT --- I apologize for the delay. My life's been a little hectic with a possible move in the works plus trying to find a new job. I have built a new package with the new file called LICENSE.fedora. It contains the email conversations that I have had with the authors regarding the licensing. I've not added any additional text into that file. Please let me know if I need to add any additional info in that file. The authors were taking the stance that they have put the license into one of the source code files, and that the rest of the files are derived works so they fall under the same license. I have not asked regarding an explicit README.Licensing file. The new SRPM can be found here: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/mediawiki-Renameuser-0-0.4.20090505svn.fc11.src.rpm Here is the new SPEC file: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/mediawiki-Renameuser.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review