Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-22 06:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the > license > - changed > 2. you should tell upstream the fullname of the regular font is "NotCourier" > not "NotCourierSans", this is likely to confuse a few apps > - I tried contacting upstream, their contact link does not work (right now) > 2. if the font is monospace (as a Nimbus Mono is likely to be) the right > fontconfig family is probably mono > - I had kept it as a sans-serif because the tags on the home page were : tags: media, font, OFL, graphic, otf, image, png, archive, zip, **sans_serif**, courier, rugular, bold Anyway, you're a better judge at that. > 3. "This is a new release of the NotCourier-sans, with its bold. The OSP frog, > the "IJ","ij", numero and trademark ligatures are now encoded in the > discretionary ligatures. " that seems release-specific. Probably not a good > idea to include it in the summary > - removed > 4. I'd have named the font at lease notcourier-sans, since notcouriersans is a > bit long, but that's a personal preference > Wouldn't notcourier-sans sound as if its a sans and not mono? I think the name the upstream's given is "notcouriersans". Anyway, I'm unable to contact them to clarify. > Only the first point is a blocker ah, great .. rebuilding.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review