Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-20 14:33:19 EDT --- This one seems to address the complaints I had previously. rpmlint is down to come complaints about no-documentation and the two zero-length files. The library situation seems sorted, and along with it the debuginfo package, and everything builds fine with current rawhide. One question I have is what you plan to do with /etc/kni and /usr/include/kni. Should they be renamed to follow the naming of this package and to avoid conflicts with the libkni package you intend to submit? It's probably easier to sort that out now rather than later. It is now perfectly safe to assume that %fedora >= 10, so the txlive-utils/tetex conditional can go away. (Or if you intend to submit this for EPEL, you can use a conditional based on %rhel, but either way the %fedora comparison is useless.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review