[Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210





--- Comment #22 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-06-17 13:47:02 EDT ---
It has been a standard procedure to remove the prebuilt binaries (whether they
are used or not). I saw and applied this on so many different packages that I
forgot that there is no specific guideline for it except this

  
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries

Since this guideline does not cover your case, I cannot claim that it is a
blocker for the review.

But I'd be happy if you reconsider. At the end of the day, it is your
responsibility that the prebuilt binaries do not end up in the RPM's. Removing
them in %prep may only make your life easier. Working on a "clean" source tree
is a good thing, at least IMHO.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]