Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-06-16 13:21:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Well, GPLv2+ and LPPL are incompatible All of the source code is GPLv2+. The only file which is LPPL is the LaTeX stylefile, which is used in exports to EPS or LaTeX format (jaxodraw's output goes into a temp file which includes the stylefile and is compiled into eps). > and as far as I > see the source code this package is still legally problematic. Howcome? It's purely GPLv2+. Quote from upstream reply: On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 09:59 +0200, Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi again, > > After some discussions with John and Jos I just want to sum up our conclusions for > reference: > > * The FORM license does not apply to any part of our work and any reference to it > will be removed > > * JaxoDraw is distributed under GPL > > * axodraw4j (and future axodraw2) are distributed under LPPL > > > Cheers, > -Lukas > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review