Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #66 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-06-15 16:09:12 EDT --- Whoa, this review is unusually long. A lot of static, though. (In reply to comment #65) > The following shows that both lapack-devel and blas-devel contain only symbolic > links on libraries and static libraries, but no header files: clip > So, if I am not mistaken, armadillo-devel does not need to list those > development packages in the 'Requires:' statement. Of course, they are needed > when building the Armadillo packages, but not any longer after that (they are > not needed by someone wanting to develop with armadillo-devel). And they are not, as you could have seen in #64. The only packages required by -devel are boost-devel and atlas-devel, which both contain headers that are used by the armadillo headers. libstdc++-devel should probably be required too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review