Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Steve Traylen <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve@xxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-15 14:16:42 EDT --- Hi Charles, I cannot sponsor you but I can hopefully provide some useful comments: "libcares.so.2()(64bit)" is picked up as a dependency so "c-ares" is not needed as a Requirement. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires There are a few rpmlint errors that look to need clearing up: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/opennhrp-0.10.3-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrp.8.gz opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrp-script.8.gz opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man5/opennhrp.conf.5.gz opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrpctl.8.gz opennhrp.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/opennhrp/opennhrp.conf opennhrp.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/opennhrp/opennhrp.conf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. you can details on any particular message with: $ rpmlint -I "executable-marked-as-config-file" Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review