Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #59 from Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-14 08:17:48 EDT --- Re: comment #55 No, that's a misinterpretation of the guidelines. The spec file's BuildRequires become the src.rpm's Requires. The gcc-c++ package is mandatory in the "development-tools" as well as "buildsys-build" comps groups. And in turn libstdc++-devel is assumed to be available, too, and need not be specified as a Requires/BuildRequires in any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review