Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #52 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-06-14 02:24:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > (In reply to comment #50) > > ... > > But, as lapack-devel and blas-devel include only libraries > > (and not header files), I would exclude the correspondent > > dependency from the 'Requires:' part. > > I see what you're getting at, but I'm not totally clear on this. Users will be > linking their armadillo programs with -larmadillo, which in turn should > automatically pull in the lapack and blas libraries. However, aren't > "/usr/lib/liblapack.so" and "/usr/lib/libblas.so" required for this to work? > (they're present in lapack-devel and blas-devel). The armadillo library is linked against blas and lapack, this is picked up by rpm which adds dependencies on the soname'd libraries as Denis said in #48. One doesn't need blas-devel and lapack-devel to use armadillo, just blas and lapack which are automatically pulled in. > > The same way, I would exclude dependency on 'libstdc++-devel'. > > Armadillo explicitly needs the header files from "libstdc++-devel", unless we > can assume that a c++ compiler will always be installed ? (I didn't want to > make a dependency on gcc-c++, as people may possibly want to use another > compiler). This, on the other hand I'd keep, since nothing picks this up automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review