Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libical - A library for parsing iCal component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197765 toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From toshio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-04 22:21 EST ------- Hope upstream is still alive or it'll start to look like the libical name is cursed :-) Have you tried Omar's email directly? The Version-Release string doesn't look right to me. You have: Version: 0.26.6 Release: 0.1.aurore%{?dist} The tarball is libical-0.26-6.aurore.tar.bz2 The tarball unzips to: libical-0.26 This isn't definitive but maybe: Version: 0.26 Release: 0.1.6.aurore%{?dist} More Licensing Woes: src/libical/icallangbind.c src/libical/icallangbind.h (C) COPYRIGHT 1999 Eric Busboom http://www.softwarestudio.org This package is free software and is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty. It may be used, redistributed and/or modified under the same terms as perl itself. ( Either the Artistic License or the GPL. ) The README says dual licensed LGPL/MPL but this conflicts.... Probably Eric Busboom needs to be contacted to see if he relicensed the library at some point and this was an oversight. hula uses an embedded copy of libical-0.24 so I'd like to see an active upstream that I can tell the hula developers they should start porting to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review