Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-06-11 08:36:32 EDT --- rpmlint output: xorriso.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/xorriso.pc xorriso.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xorriso-0.3.8/CONTRIBUTORS 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. - I have no idea why a pkgconfig file is provided, usually they're only used in development packages such as libraries. - Drop the CONTRIBUTORS file and add [ -s CONTRIBUTORS ] && exit 1 to %setup so that you will be notified if the file gains content later on. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. NEEDSWORK - Change Release: 1%{?dist} to Release: 1.%{__patchlevel}%{?dist} MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is GPLv2 and GPL+ and (LGPLv2+ or MIT), not GPLv2. * Most of the files are under GPLv2. * cleanup is under GPL license (GPL+) * make_isohybrid_mr is LGPLv2+ or MIT. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - No source URL provided. Source matches upstream. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Time stamps are not preserved, use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. N/A MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. NEEDSWORK - Add Requires: pkgconfig. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK - Not all licenses are included. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review