Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-11 08:03:29 EDT --- OK rpmlint on every package. OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK package has a good license. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. ? The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK successful koji compilation. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405135 OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review