Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-11 04:49:49 EDT --- 1. www.web-insights.net does not resolve for me. 2. There is no URL on Source0. 3. The COPYING file is GPLv2 but the library sources are LGPLv2.1+. As you're the upstream, please add also the LGPLv2.1 text in the original tarball. 4. There is missing rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT on the beginning of %install. 5. The symlink libcap-ng.so in the -devel subpackage should be in %{_libdir} not /%{_lib}/ rpmlint is silent: $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-debuginfo-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-devel-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-devel.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4-1.src.rpm libcap-ng.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-utils-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-utils.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review