[Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958





--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-06-10 20:01:33 EDT ---
A few additional comments.  Generally I would suggest that you run rpmlint on
your packages and fix the obvious things.

CeCILL-C_V1-*.txt need to be run through iconv.

The file in ld.so.conf.d either shouldn't be marked %config or should be marked
%config(noreplace).  I don't think the user is supposed to edit it, so the
former seems more correct to me.

For some weird reason all of the libraries and executables end up mode 0775 for
me.  Do you see that?  It could be a weird problem with my buildsystem, but I'm
not sure.

No parallel make?  If it doesn't work, you should at least add a comment to
that effect.

Several of the executable names seem destined to conflict.  For example,
/usr/bin/gbase conflicts with http://www.hibernaculum.net/gbase/index.php which
isn't in Fedora but which is in various other distros.  /usr/bin/mtst conflict
with the mt-st package in some distros (suse, for example), although Fedora
seems to call the binary simply /usr/bin/mt.  /usr/bin/gpart conflicts with the
gpart package currently in Fedora (i586 only, though).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]