[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422





--- Comment #68 from Stephen Lau <stevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-06-10 15:05:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #66)
> (In reply to comment #65)
> > stuff just for Linux since it's entirely possible we could deliver binary-only
> > components again in the future for Linux users.
> 
> I don't want to get much involved with this review, but why not just let
> gstreamer deal with the codecs mess? And if you want to provide some
> binary-only codecs, why not to make repository of them and let PackageKit use
> it as (optional of course) additional source of codecs?
> 
> But, that's just off-topic to the issue of EULA.  

Sorry for the confusion, but I was talking about proprietary/binary-only
add-ons (in the sense of Songbird add-ons which are like Firefox add-ons...
packaged in .xpis, that augment the app by giving it new skins, or new
functionality).

The codecs themselves are all managed by GStreamer as you'd expect.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]