Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2009-06-10 10:10:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > - Setting umask is probably not necessary as this is done by rpm. > > - Replace `which mkfontdir` with plain mkfontdir. > > Not sure about these. The scriptlets were copied from urw-fonts, so if they > need fixing they ought to be fixed in both places. urw-fonts hasn't been through a merge review, so you really can't trust that the packaging is sane on all accounts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review