Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-04 13:45 EST ------- Why should I enable 'ntsysv' variant of bitlbee? When reading bitlbee.conf, I think, I shouldn't do that (on the other hand: How to (re-)name two identical services to avoid confusions in /usr/sbin/ntsysv?): ## Inetd -- Run from inetd (default) ## Daemon -- Run as a stand-alone daemon -- EXPERIMENTAL! BitlBee is not yet ## stable enough to serve lots of users from one process. Because of this ## and other reasons, the use of daemon-mode is *STRONGLY* discouraged, ## don't even *think* of reporting bugs when you use this. I need "those perl calls" you mentioned in comment #14, to do a %makeinstall rather a couple of "install -mXYZ" like you are doing. Finally it saves nothing, so we could switch over when this makes you even more happy. Hmm...xmlto really seems to be required no longer, it's just a hangover from older times. Regarding the proxy stuff, could it be a problem openssl vs. gnutls? Personally, I would be happy if there's a technical reason to prefer openssl over gnutls ;-) Ah, adding an own user for bitlbee is a very good idea! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review