Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs@xxxxxxxxxx Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot@l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-08 10:00:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Can you please check whether it will work or not? 1. Unless saab is derived from lohit punjabi and they have the same look and metrics I'd really not include <alias binding="same"> <family>Lohit Punjabi</family> <accept> <family>Saab</family> </accept> </alias> 2. The 90 priority is safe, but very conservative. I'd discuss with the Lohit people and i18n if Saab could not be bumped a little. 3. Please cc the fonts list on fonts review so the right people get cc-ed 4. Please also check you didn't miss any step in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review