Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2009-06-06 17:20:41 EDT --- 1. The README_License_msm file (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/README_License_msm) has been added, with the correspondence clarifying the license issue: that package follows GPLv2+. 2. The URL has been changed, so as to reflect the actual Web site of the R-msm package (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/index.html). 3. The %check was commented... because I forgot to uncomment it (I usually first test building packages without enabling the tests, as they take a lot of time) :) The new RPM package proposal is therefore below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/R-msm.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/R-msm-0.8.2-2.fc10.src.rpm (to check the differences, the older versions are to be found at the following location: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/1/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review