Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wfut - WorldForge media updater tool Alias: wfut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202853 chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From chris.stone@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-03 21:27 EST ------- - rpmlint output clean - package named according to package naming guildelines - spec file name matches %{name} - package meets packaging guidelines - licensed with open source compatible license - license matches actual license - license file included in %doc - spec file written in American english - spec file is legible - sources match upstream 23d40558c121d5c52917846a36d48b80 WFUT-1.0-SNAPSHOT-src.tar.gz - compiles and builds on fc5 x86_64 - all build dependencies listed in build requires - package does not use locales - package does not contain shared libraries - package is not relocatable - package owns all directories it creates - no duplicates in %files - permissions on files set properly - contains proper %clean section - macro usage is consistent - package contains permissible content - no large documentation - %doc files do not affect runtime - no header files or static libraries - no pkgconfig files - no library files - no devel package - no .la files - package is a GUI application and contains proper desktop files - package does not own files or directories owned by other packages I can't find anything wrong with this spec file. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review