Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #18 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2009-06-01 18:14:00 EDT --- That's fine, if you like, I shall be honoured to go on with the review (thanks Peter and Michael!). As for the failing build on Fedora 9, I just forgot to enclose the 'BuildArch: noarch' directive within the '%if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 [...] %endif' condition... It now works well, as Koji shows: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1388361 Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/7/stxxl.spec (as well as the corresponding Source RPM: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/7/stxxl-1.2.1-7.fc10.src.rpm) As I have changed only the BuildArch directive, it does not imply any change on Fedora 10, 11 and 12. So, if you agree with that new version, I shall approve the package. ---------------- As for the build system, I proposed to ADD a new one, not to replace the existing one. Hence, (part of) the upstream team may still work with their current building system, if they are happy with it (though I do not understand how they install that library, since there is apparently no such possibility in the current build system!). And an additional GNU Autotools build system would allow (plenty of) other developers to build, install and package in a standard way, without too much maintenance. That is simply what I suggested, and see no reason why the upstream team should be against. Without such a standard build system, it means that, as the main maintainer of the package, you will have more work every time a new upstream will be released. But, that is my $0.02, and as far as I understand, it should not interfere with Fedora packaging :) --------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review