Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-06-01 15:34:03 EDT --- Good: + License tag says GPLv2 now. Bad: - Header files has a reverence of special exceptions on the copyright notes, which are not clarified. - package doesn't contains a verbatin copy of the license text. The LICENSE files only told anything about the GPL and down't match with the copyright note of the source files, because the LICENSE files allow the use of a later version of the GPL, but the copyright notes on the sources doesn't. Please calrified the licensing situation of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review