[Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175





--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-06-01 08:08:23 EDT ---
Parag, can you please point out, where my spec file does not match with the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl guidelines? The following list
compares https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl with my spec file where
"NA" means that it doesn't applicate here and "--" that I'm missing it. The
only thing, I'm really missing is %check, that's right. And that's solved in
-2 now.

[OK] License tag
[OK] Directory Ownership
[OK] Perl Requires and Provides
[OK] Core modules as buildrequires
[OK] Versioned MODULE_COMPAT_ Requires
[NA] Filtering Requires: and Provides
[OK] Manual Requires and Provides
[OK] URL tag
[--] Testing and Test Suites
[NA] When to *not* test
[NA] Conditionally enabling/disabling tests
[OK] Makefile.PL vs Build.PL
[NA] .h files in module packages

Why should I use cpanspec if my spec file is valid and follows the policies?


Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]