Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #4 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora@xxxxxxx> 2009-05-31 16:10:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I had added the EPEL RPM repository, and those macros were defined. But, as you suggested, I made a typo when trying to evaluate them with 'rpm --eval' :) However, I had it right in the specification file (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/wsdlpull/123/wsdlpull.spec) and: * All the packages, including the "doc" one, are generated under the specific architecture (RPMS/x86_64 in my case) directory (as expected). * Again as you suggested, it appears that it is just rpmlint returning a false positive. It is certainly due to the rpmlint "W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package" bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488930). That bug has been corrected in version from 0.87-1, whereas the latest version available on CentOS 5.3 (Fedora EPEL 5) is 0.85-3 (newer versions are not even available in the epel-testing repository). So, that package builds nicely on all the platforms (Fedora 10, 11, rawhide and EPEL 5). For instance, for F11/F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review