Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #11 from D Haley <mycae@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-31 01:00:28 EDT --- Some quick replies: > Why should we put this in %doc? How is it remotely helpful? Maybe %doc is not quite the right place, but as far as I can see it is only an example makefile, hence documentation, or similar. It certainly should not be executable, nor should it be mislabelled as a shell script and definitely does not belong in /usr/bin. > This is poor coding practice by upstream, but it isn't a blocker. Still, please try to contact upstream and if they reply put a copy of the relevant reply here. or state that they are non-responsive. I note that te > Again, upstream's fault... This is a blocker. I cannot confirm the md5sum without this, which is required for review - we need to build against an upstream tarball somewhere, and agree on its location. http://www-lmc.imag.fr/CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/Downloads/ may have what we need. >Sorry, I'm not familiar with the use of this library, I'm just interested in >getting SAGE (and dependencies) packaged and in Fedora. I need some way to confirm that the system is working properly -- do you have a suggestion? >gmp++ is C++ bindings for gmp, I think So is this two separate projects bundled into one? I am totally confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review