Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #10 from Louis Lagendijk <louis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-30 16:46:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > For 0.5.4-1: > > * cups_backend_dir > - Well, according to cups.spec on Fedora %cups_backend_dir is > %{_exec_prefix}/lib/cups, not %{_libdir}/cups/backend > ( note that on 64 bit architecture, %_exec_prefix is /usr, > while %_libdir is /usr/lib64 ) > corrected. I got misled by the description of the macros on the Wiki. Using the same as what cups does is indeed the bet way. Thanks! > * %setup > - "%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}" can be replaced by > "%setup -q" > Corrected > Then: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. > Thanks for the offer. I will start working on some reviews and/or other packages as soon as possible. I seem to have picked a bad time to apply as packager with first a holiday and now a business trip coming up. But first there is an updated package version available: Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for your excellent input, guidance and review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review