Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-30 08:46:36 EDT --- I just don't feel like deciding about this. The question I have is whether the author would object to inclusion of dansguardian in RHEL (if that ever happens). RHEL is freely distributable (and of course there is CentOS), but Red Hat charges for support, so the limitations on his page http://dansguardian.org/?page=copyright2 are unequivocal. Probably best would be get the author's statement on the issue. Blocking FE-LEGAL again and posting question to fedora-legal. Aside from this issue this package is OK, and it would be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review