Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #30 from Hal Finkel <half@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-29 23:14:11 EDT --- Looking at the Debian copyright file, there seem to be only three files in ACE proper which could be problematic. ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_wchar.cpp - This has a 4-clause BSD license with copyright belonging to the The Regents of the University of California. The advertising clause, however, may have been "deleted", and, if so, this file should be updated (ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change). ACE_wrappers/ace/Get_Opt.cpp - This has a 4-clause BSD license with copyrights belonging to he Regents of the University of California and to The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. The NetBSD license, may have been changed to the 2-clause version, and, if so, this file should be updated (http://www.netbsd.org/about/redistribution.html#why2clause). ACE_wrappers/ace/UTF*_Encoding_Converter.* - These have a license from Unicode, Inc. which, in part, reads, "Unicode, Inc. hereby grants the right to freely use the information supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard, and to make copies of this file in any form for internal or external distribution as long as this notice remains attached." This restriction on use may render the files non-free. Fortunately, replacing them should not be difficult. The TAO components can be removed. In fact, source packages of only ACE (no TAO, etc.) are released as part of the normal upstream release cycle (see: http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review