[Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221





--- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-29 15:23:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 
> There is a subtlety here. I first thought of doing it that way but then I
> realized that it would be problematic on x86_64. On x86_64, when someone
> installs dssi-vst, the
>    dssi-vst.x86_64
>    dssi-vst-wine.i586
> packages will be installed. If I put a
>    Requires: dssi
> on the dssi-vst-wine package, it will pull dssi.x86_64 during installation, and
> dssi.x86_64 does not own /usr/lib/dssi. The only solution I found was to own
> /usr/lib/dssi by dssi-vst-wine.i586 so that we have all directories owned in
> all archs.
> 
> Please let me know if you find a better solution.

I see your point here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]