[Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975





--- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-27 12:49:35 EDT ---
Tank you. The licensing guideline says

"If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything
about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The
version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it
could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll use
COPYING to imply that it is under the GPL, all versions (GPL+)."

That's why I used GPL+. Please see case #4 at
   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ

I already asked Hermann to include the GPL version in the source headers a
while ago (around guitarix-0.04-2) but he didn't do it. I guess we will have to
live with what we have.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]