Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #16 from steve <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-27 07:34:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Thanks for your time and comments spot. Sorry about the slip-ups, this is the first time I played around with autotools and have learned a lot in the process. > Well, if you're going to use a shared library here, you should do it properly, > as a versioned .so, with proper packaging. > > libWN_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 3:0:0 > > will give you what you want, although, you might talk to upstream to be sure > they're okay with the .so numbering starting there. > I did mail upstream about this but got no response back. I also checked other distributions (ubuntu and mandriva) and they seem to be using version 3.x.x for the .so ...so, i went with that. > Don't forget to delete the .la and .a file, your -devel wildcard is catching > them. See why wildcards are tricky! :) Yep ! ...and Done > Also, you need to change a few things to ensure that the autotooling happens > cleanly, specifically: > > * BuildRequires: libtool > * autoreconf -i instead of just autoreconf Done The new spec and srpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-6.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review