Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #9 from David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> 2009-05-26 11:47:41 EDT --- So I talked to a FPC member and the gist of the conversation is: These libraries have to go. In order of preference: 1) Upstream the patches, eg have upstream (enano) commit their changes to the library project in question. 2) Fork from upstream. eg, have enano essentially fork the packages and begin maintaining a fork of each of those libraries (which will then need to be packaged) 3) Other solution.... I don't know what other solution exists to be honest, though I imagine that there exists some novel solution. Unfortunately a lot of this seems very much out of your hands and in the hands of upstream. Let me know how I can help you proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review