Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-26 06:56:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The AC_FUNC_MALLOC is some kind of fallback for environments which don't have a > malloc() function in their libc. If this is the case (apparently it is for > MinGW), then a '#define malloc rpl_malloc' is added to config.h. I agree we don't want rpl_malloc. The question is why does it fail to find the malloc in libmsvcrt.a (or newer friends). libmsvcrt.a provides _malloc: i686-pc-mingw32-nm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libmsvcrt.a dxnmbs00676.o: 00000000 b .bss 00000000 d .data 00000000 i .idata$4 00000000 i .idata$5 00000000 i .idata$6 00000000 i .idata$7 00000000 t .text U __head_libmsvcrt_a 00000000 I __imp__malloc 00000000 T _malloc But that shouldn't hold up packaging. APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review