Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #5 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-24 17:31:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Okay, after adding libjpeg-devel builds. > > This is fixed upstream. Thanks for pointing it out! This is included in new upstream release, 0.4.1 > > However, the package uses its own versions of libmetalink and uri, which is not > > allowed. You have already packaged libmetalink; there isn't a package of uri > > yet. You need to make one and patch this package to use the packaged versions > > of libmetalink and uri. > > > > > > https://gna.org/projects/uri/ > > I found out that uri has not been maintained for 8 years, but a similar library > called uriparser is actively developed. > > The current plan upstream is to switch to uriparser ( > http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ ) which is already packaged for Fedora & > other distributions. Upstream has switched from uri to uriparser. The package no longer uses its own version of libmetalink. * Sun May 24 2009 Ant Bryan <anthonybryan at gmail.com> - 0.4.1-1 - Upstream release 0.4.1, change from liburi to uriparser - Add BuildRequires: uriparser-devel - Remove BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1433317 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/mulk/mulk-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review