[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737


Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #25 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-23 03:57:07 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> ...
> > Should Fix:
> > -----------
> ...
> > * Consider renaming the manpages to mathio-<foo> and installing them
> Actually, thoses manpages are removed from matio svn trunk. My view is that
> they provide the same information as doxygen (since both pdf and manpages are
> generated from doxygen). Keeping html doxygen is lightweight and

Ok.

> > * Is it really useful to put the test files in a subpacke, wouldn't it be
> > better
> >   to run them as %check and not put them in an rpm at all ?  
> Nice suggest. I've done that since the test_* file are likely not useful beyond
> build time.
>

Much better :)

> All others point are fixed.
> 

Ack, looks good now, APPROVED!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]