Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-22 10:57:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > As discussed on the mailing list, I don't know if this review needs to be > continued: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001469.html As far as I understand, Tor Lillqvist's gripes were: - same DLL filename for two completely incompatible libraries - use of "secret sauce" to compile the DLL You do neither. There's no secret sauce as far as I can see, and librxspencer-0.dll does not clash with any preexisting DLL afaik. So IMO we can continue. Anyway, I think it would be good to follow Kalev's comments, even though the project hasn't done a release the last 15 or so years and it's therefore quite unlikely it will anytime soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review