Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-22 09:01:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines > version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to > stick to the native version Yeah I know, but there was a message on the fedora-mingw mailing list recently that we were advised to upgrade to version 1.1 as it contains several win32 optimalisations: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001355.html > ! use %global instead of %define A lot of MinGW packages we have use these %define's. I think we should check every MinGW package which is in Fedora now and fix the packages if necessary. For this package I've replaced the %define's with %global's: Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libssh2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review