Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-22 06:52:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I guess we are only supposed to package libraries that are also available as > native packages (at least where it makes sense). I can't seem to find a native > package. Shouldn't native be packaged first? That's not a hard requirement. The requirement is only that what we package is a development tool or library. We do package other stuff that's not available natively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review