Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-21 08:39:15 EDT --- Minor quibble, [-] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] php no binary build. What is meant here is the product RPM as opposed to SRPM, not binary executable as opposed to script. Essentially, rpmbuild -ba foo.spec must produce something in ../RPMS/*/. FYI. :) Also, for the Requires, if any of those pear packages exist in Fedora as RPMS, they should be Required. If not, and this software needs them, they need to be packaged and included in Fedora before this can be. I see that this has a blocking bug, so maybe that's going on, I didn't dig that far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review