Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geda-examples - Circuit examples for gEDA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204601 ------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-01 20:39 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > This package is very simple and there exists little > problems or questions. > > > First review of geda-examples : > > 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : > > * Requires > * File and Directory Ownership > > - Well, this package may be unuseful without geda-gschem, > however, does this package "really require" geda-gschem? > > I mean that for example, xorg-x11-docs maybe unuseful without > xorg-x11 installed, however, xorg-x11-docs itself does not > require anything. > The files provided by this package can be read via schematic editor. That is why it requires geda-gschem Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.funpic.de/rpm/geda-examples-20060123-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review