Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #16 from Conrad Sanderson <conradsand@xxxxxxxx> 2009-05-20 23:42:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) The spec file has been improved and the rpms checked through rpmlint. There are two minor warnings: # rpmlint armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.6.11 armadillo.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # rpmlint armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not sure why there is the unstripped-binary-or-object warning. According to Comment #3 (Ralf Corsepius), "In Fedora, libs are supposed to be built unstripped (rpm strips them later)". Is this a problem worth worrying about ? New spec file and source rpm are located at: http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review