Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #4 from leigh scott <leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-20 20:20:14 EDT --- OK, I found this new gmixer sourcecode at launchpad, it isn't the same package but looks promising. It didn't have a desktop file either, what do you think of the new gmixer code ? Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/2/gmixer.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/2/gmixer-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint returns this rpmlint -vi /home/leigh/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/gmixer-1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm gmixer.x86_64: I: checking gmixer.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The package doesn't drag python-xlib as a requires so I added it to the spec file. P.S sorry for switching source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review