Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa@xxxxxxxx | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-19 09:26:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Spot, can we assume the text regarding licensing being ASL 2.0 at: > > http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html > > applies to the whole project? The files in this package (569 lines in total > among 4 files) have no license headers and there is no license text in SVN. Given how divergent the licensing has been in the various plexus bits, I don't think we can safely make that assumption. We need upstream to clarify things, preferrably by fixing their file attribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review