Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-17 06:24:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Hmm, you write there: > > "The reason behind this report is Fedora's policy of handling flags. They must > > be split (or removed completely) to a subpackage that is not installed by > > default. This was caused by some political case." > > > > Is this actual policy (as in written down somewhere and approved by Fesco) ? > > or just something which was decided adhoc somewhere ? > > The policy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Flags was approved on one > of FESCo meetings as per https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/110 Ah I wasn't aware of this policy, glad I mist the flame fest one that one :) (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > As promised I will review this, but it looks like we first need to address > > the flags issue <sigh>, assigning to me. > > I'm thinking, that we can just hide language column with flags. If such > solution would be acceptable, I can come with a patch for it. Would there then still be a way for the user to find out the server language from the pick a server UI ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review