Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 --- Comment #5 from Felix Kaechele <felix@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-16 13:27:05 EDT --- The following items have been checked and are ok: 1. rpmlint is silent 2. package name complies to guidelines 3. package meets packaging guidelines 4. sha1sums match: [felix@polaris SOURCES]$ sha1sum drascula-audio-1.0.zip* 6618ebe2f08f94836262bc68de6022f9d8f9b081 drascula-audio-1.0.zip 6618ebe2f08f94836262bc68de6022f9d8f9b081 drascula-audio-1.0.zip.orig 5. the spec file is really simple and legible even by my 80-year old grandma 6. the package builds great because it's noarch :-) 7. Requires and BuildReqs are sane 8. file ownership is ok 9. macro usage is reasonable 10. package contains content 11. doesn't own stuff it shouldn't own The following items need to be addressed: 1. Is this really GPLv2+? the readme doesn't state so. Maybe the same mistake as in the drascula-international package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review