Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bitlbee https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196591 ------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-09-01 08:41 EST ------- I'll review your x86_64 patch and add when there's a reference to a upstream bug report having the patch also applied (and maybe reviewed by upstream). Regarding openssl vs. gnutls please read the comments above. I'm not interested in gnutls but to make Michael happy, I'm using it - for the same non-technical reason you provide, too. Using condrestart for xinetd is accepted and will be added. I'm only binding to 127.0.0.1 and the package itself works for me about a year as you can see from my changelog ;-) This also should answer the question regarding "daemon"; yes, bitlbee can write to /var/lib/bitlbee, because it's set in the xinetd file. You're simply doing exactly the same, but using the user "nobody" for. But it would be interesting to know whether "daemon" or "nobody" is better... I think, I'll push a new package when you've the testing completed and I got more input. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review