Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn <fenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-15 14:29:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ping, any progress? > upstream suggests separating the libraries out. the packages that would require this: pmgZ: GPLv2+ (http://www.fetk.org/codes/pmg/index.html) maloc: GPLv2+ (http://www.fetk.org/codes/maloc/index.html) aqua: no license info available, can't locate source online opal: LBNLBSD (http://nbcr.net/software/opal/) python-ZSI: already available for fedora. the last two aren't required for the apbs binary, only for server-client applications utilizing apbs. I should also note the licenses are different some of the web based downloads than those included with apbs (e.g. maloc carries LGPLv2+ headers in the apbs download). I'll get in touch with upstream again re. the licensing/availability of aqua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review