Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-15 11:38:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The following items need to be addressed: > 1. License seems to be called "Revolution Software Freeware License" > (http://liberatedgames.org/licenses/Revolution_Software_Freeware_License.txt). > Does this affect the naming of the License in the spec? Is this GPLv2+ at all? > > When the license question is cleared out I will approve this package. Hmm, I've no idea how I ended up with GPLv2+ in the license tag here, a copy and paste error probably, sorry. The correct license tag should be: License: Freely redistributable without restriction The license has been checked (for another Revolution_Software_Freeware_License game) and been ok-ed by Spot: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00030.html Here is an updated version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-international.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-international-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm p.s. 1) Can you also review drascula-music please, after some discussion it was decided it is better to have the music in a separate package instead of having it in the main package, see bug 494197 2) How are things going with the openttd open content package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review