Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tuxpaint-stamps - Extra stamp files for tuxpaint https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204852 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2006-09-01 01:08 EST ------- {Not Official Review} packaging looks ok. + Mockbuild is successfull for i386 FC6 - rpmlint on binary rpm is NOT silent E: tuxpaint-stamps incorrect-locale-sv /usr/share/locale/sw/LC_MESSAGES/tuxpaint-stamps.mo + dist tag is present + Buildroot is correct + source URL is correct + BR is correct + License used is GPL + License file COPYING is included + MD5 sum on tarball is matching upstream tarball 6edf92504b1b9f9943e3b28011738691 tuxpaint-stamps-2005.11.25.tar.gz + No duplicate files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review