Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> 2009-05-15 04:37:16 EDT --- Haven't found further issues. Instead of depending on "chkconfig" and "initscripts", you can prefer a dependency on /sbin/chkconfig and /sbin/service instead, since you execute those tools with absolute path. The dependency on those file locations is not more expensive than requiring the package names. The file Provides for files in many (or all) *bin* paths as well as files in /etc are covered by the primary metadata file. More packages do it already, too. $ repoquery --whatrequires /sbin/chkconfig|wc -l 364 $ repoquery --whatrequires chkconfig|wc -l 202 APPROVED : gvrpcd-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review